Ivermectin - Government of India’s second punch on WHO’s face.

 Ivermectin - Government of India’s second punch on WHO’s face.

Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, Dr. Tedros & Directorate General of Health Services (DGHS) are now checkmated after Governments submission on 16^th June, 2021.

Health Ministry again confirmed before High Court about their stand in favor of Ivermectin.

The guidelines dated 24.05.2021 recommending Ivermectin are the final stand of the stand of the Government. The Pharma Mafia’s narrative regarding tampered overruled guidelines of DGHS is collapsed.

The DGHS removed the controversial protocol dated 27.05.2021 after receipt of notice.

Now website of DGHS is showing only undated guidelines are being shown. Which are not mandatory to anyone.

Mumbai:- During hearing of PIL on 16^th June, 2021 before Bombay High Court the Union of India once again cleared its stand in favor of Ivermectin.

This was one more punch on the face of the WHO, Vaccine Mafia, paid media and main conspirator Dr. Soumya Swaminathan.

India and many Countries refused to follow the advisories of the WHO when they found that the advisory of WHO are sponsored, motivated and dubious with vested interest. WHO has lost its credibility.

Due to India’s positive stand on Ivermectin there was a retaliation from Vaccine Mafia and a misinformation campaign was run against the Government of India, honest doctors and all those who were supporting and attempts were made to defame the efforts taken by the honest doctors and their effective result due to use of Ivermectin.

When investigation was ordered by the Government of India on the issue of ‘toolkit’ for such misinformation then all the sensational news disappeared.

Now there are no cases of emergency use of Oxygen Cylinder etc.

However Dr. Soumya Swaminathan the Chief Scientist of WHO keep on manipulating the minds of public and on 10^th May 2021, tweeted against the use of Ivermectin.

When she was served with the legal notice by Indian Bar Association she deleted said tweet.

Thereafter, on 7^th June 2021 Dr. Soumya Swaminathan again tweeted and tried to confuse the people on the basis of non-binding protocol of DGHS which was publish on 27^th May 2021. The false narrative was publish in verious media.

Therefore, Indian Bar Association issued second notice for Contempt to Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Dr. Soumya Swaminathan and Prof. (Dr.) Sunil Kumar, Directorate General of Health Services (DGHS).

After receipt of said notice the DGHS removed the protocol dated 27^th May 2021.

On 16^th June one PIL (ST) No. 10766 OF 2021 Vikrant Girish Sansare Vs. State of Maharashta, was listed before Bombay High Court for hearing.

The Union of India and State of Maharashtra made it clear that they have already included the Ivermectin into their protocol.

The protocol relied by the Union of India was the protocol dated 24.05.2021.

Hence, it is clear that the unscientific suggestions of DGHS are not accepted by the experts.

The High Court took the note of it and observed as under;

“1…The petitioner has prayed for a writ of mandamus for a direction to the State Government and the Union of India to include in the standard protocols for treatment of Covid-19, the drug Ivermectin and Vitamin D3 supplements, as prophylaxis for prevention and also for treatment of Covid-19 disease.

3. On behalf of the Union of India, reply has been filed of Mr.Govind Jaiswal working as Director in the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.

Hence, no action on the part of the Central Health Ministry is necessary, as it has already issued clinical guidance for management of the adult Covid-19 patients by issuing guidelines dated 24th May 2021, which are also placed on record.

4. A reply affidavit has been filed on behalf of the State Government of Dr.Sadhana M. Tayde, Director in the office of the Commissioner of Health Services, Mumbai.

It is thus submitted that since the usage of tablet Ivermectin is prescribed by the State Government, the medical fraternity is already using the same and no new advisory needs to be issued.

5. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties. We have also perused the record. At the outset, we would observe that not only the Central Government, but also the State Government has already issued Covid-19 protocol as noted by us above and as such, the grievance of the petitioner as subject matter of prayer clause (a) would not survive.

6… We have already noted that such drug finds a mention in the protocol and it is always for the concerned doctors to prescribe such medication as suitable to the patient considering his clinical condition.

7. We, accordingly, dispose of this PIL petition, as, in our opinion, the grievance of the petitioner ought to does not survive considering the steps taken by the Central Government and the State Government.”

 

 Courtesy of cartoons: all respective cartoonists .